Archives

JAMA Summit Report on Reducing Firearm Violence and Harms—Reply

In Reply We appreciate the comments of Drs Beard and Healy on the report of the JAMA Summit on Reducing Firearm Violence and Harms. A significant focus of the Summit and report was on community interventions to reduce violence and firearm harms, and members of the Summit did include experts in hospital violence intervention programs as well as individuals who provide trauma care. The participants viewed hospital violence intervention programs as part of several other community violence interventions, which start at the bedside and extend out into the community for months after the injury. These programs do not focus on “stigmatizing measures of recidivism,” but rather look far beyond to address immediate needs and long-term impact on life trajectories.

Attitudes toward physician-provided gun safety counselling among current and prospective gun owners in the USA

Background

Americans increasingly perceive that homes with guns are safer than those without, and physician counselling about in-home firearm safety and injury risks occurs infrequently, despite encouragement from major medical organisations (eg, American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics). Safety counselling that does occur may be limited to gun owners at high risk of injury; however, given the increasing rates of first-time gun ownership in the USA, understanding attitudes toward firearms and firearm safety messaging among persons who may become firearm owners is needed to inform and support continued injury prevention efforts.

Methods

Survey data from a cross-section of firearm owners (n=396) and non-owners (n=551) collected in February 2023 was used to examine differences in perceptions about the safety of firearm households, openness toward firearm safety counselling and comfort with law enforcement compared with physician firearm safety discussions.

Results

Over three-quarters of current and possible future gun owners agreed that firearms make homes safer, compared with just over one-third of non-owners. All three groups favoured law enforcement over physicians for firearm safety messengers and were more comfortable speaking with law enforcement than physicians about firearm safety.

Discussion and conclusion

Public health and injury prevention safety counselling that combines messaging from law enforcement and medical perspectives may be similarly accessible for both current firearm owners and those considering owning firearms in the future.

Trends in mortality after emergency department presentation for suicidal behaviour in California

Introduction

Emergency department patients presenting with non-fatal suicidal behaviour face elevated risk of suicide and all-cause mortality, but the extent to which this has changed over time is unknown. This study tracked trends in mortality risks faced by emergency department patients presenting with deliberate self-harm and suicidal ideation in California.

Methods

Using statewide linked emergency department and death data, we estimated 2010–2016 trends in suicide and all-cause mortality among emergency department patients with either deliberate self-harm (n=111 658) or suicidal ideation (n=162 959). We also calculated average annual percent changes in age-adjusted mortality rates and compared these to the general California population.

Results

Deliberate self-harm and suicidal ideation patients’ age-adjusted suicide rates decreased by approximately 5% per year during the study period; however, their all-cause mortality trends were flat. In the general California population, suicide rate trends were flat while all-cause mortality slightly declined.

Conclusions

Suicide mortality unexpectedly declined among self-harming and suicidal patients presenting to California emergency departments. Additional research is needed to understand the reasons behind this decline and inform quality improvement efforts for suicide prevention in hospital settings.

Sequelae and Care After Firearm Injury

This JAMA Insights discusses evidence about the care of patients with firearm injury, including management of chronic pain, peripheral nerve injury, and lead toxicity from bullet fragments.

Education for healthcare professionals and firearm injury

Background

There is consensus on the need and ability to address firearm injury risk in healthcare settings; however, the lack of education for healthcare professionals hinders the implementation of evidence-based firearm injury and mortality prevention strategies. The objectives of this study are to develop, disseminate and evaluate education for team members to facilitate implementation in emergency departments

Method

Two-tiered education was developed in partnership with stakeholders and disseminated to the healthcare team, covering evidence-based screening and interventions for firearm access and violence risk. The implementation, development and dissemination strategies followed the framework used for systemwide Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment implementation for substance use. Team members who screened patients for firearm injury risk received screening education and team members meeting with patients who screened positive received intervention education. Participants completed surveys to evaluate the education and learning objectives.

Results

Across three emergency departments from March 2021 to May 2022, 267 team members completed screening education. Key takeaways reported by 173 participants were how to screen (24.9%), the 5L’s of Firearm Safety (19.7%) and the prevalence of firearm injury (11.0%). Participants still had questions about workflow, resources and safety. 34 of 67 (50.7%) intervention education participants completed the postsurvey. 100% were confident they could screen, 79% were confident they could provide brief interventions and 88% were confident their site could implement firearm injury prevention strategies.

Conclusion

Tiered education for firearm injury prevention screening and intervention achieved learning objectives and facilitated programme implementation. Education increased knowledge and confidence regarding firearm injury risk screening and its importance in healthcare settings.

Navigating Dual-Harm

American Journal of Public Health, Volume 115, Issue 4, Page 596-604, April 2025.

Gun violence exposure and population health inequality

This essay establishes a conceptual framework to understand how direct, secondary and community exposures to gun violence converge to influence population health. Our framework asserts that persistent gun violence in structurally disadvantaged communities enacts broad consequences for mental, physical and behavioural health, operating as a key driver of racial and socioeconomic health disparities. We discuss the applications of this framework for research and improved data collection with a focus on establishing timely and accurate measures of gun violence alongside individual and community health measures. We then address the policy implications of the framework, emphasising the need for long-term, institutional investment in gun violence prevention and intervention, survivor service provision and evidence-based policies at all levels of government.

Firearm Policy in the Hospital Setting

To the Editor In their article, Mr Romero and colleagues discussed the consequences of recent Supreme Court decisions on the possession of firearms, especially the possibility that declaring hospitals a firearm-free domain breaches Second Amendment rights. If that is true, then it applies to hospital staff as well as patients and their relatives. How will patients feel about their physician having an AR-15 on their desk during an examination?